↓ Skip to main content

American Association for Cancer Research

Article Metrics

National Survey of Patient Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer Screening Preferences

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Prevention Research, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 1,186)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
39 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 tweeters
Title
National Survey of Patient Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer Screening Preferences
Published in
Cancer Prevention Research, April 2021
DOI 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-20-0524
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xuan Zhu, Philip D. Parks, Emily Weiser, Kristin Fischer, Joan M. Griffin, Paul J. Limburg, Lila J. Finney Rutten

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 280. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2021.
All research outputs
#70,197
of 17,991,759 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Prevention Research
#12
of 1,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,314
of 312,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Prevention Research
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,991,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.