↓ Skip to main content

American Association for Cancer Research

Article Metrics

The costs and benefits of risk-stratification for colorectal cancer screening based on phenotypic and genetic risk: a health economic analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Prevention Research, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 tweeters
Title
The costs and benefits of risk-stratification for colorectal cancer screening based on phenotypic and genetic risk: a health economic analysis
Published in
Cancer Prevention Research, May 2021
DOI 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-20-0620
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chloe Thomas, Olena Mandrik, Catherine L Saunders, Deborah Thompson, Sophie Whyte, Simon Griffin, Juliet A Usher-Smith

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,173,392
of 17,995,569 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Prevention Research
#135
of 1,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,508
of 249,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Prevention Research
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,995,569 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.