| Title |
Comprehensive Genomic and Transcriptomic Analysis for Guiding Therapeutic Decisions in Patients with Rare CancersGenomic Profiling of Rare Cancers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Discovery, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-0126 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Horak, Christoph Heining, Simon Kreutzfeldt, Barbara Hutter, Andreas Mock, Jennifer Hüllein, Martina Fröhlich, Sebastian Uhrig, Arne Jahn, Andreas Rump, Laura Gieldon, Lino Möhrmann, Dorothea Hanf, Veronica Teleanu, Christoph E. Heilig, Daniel B. Lipka, Michael Allgäuer, Leo Ruhnke, Andreas Laßmann, Volker Endris, Olaf Neumann, Roland Penzel, Katja Beck, Daniela Richter, Ulrike Winter, Stephan Wolf, Katrin Pfütze, Christina Geörg, Bettina Meißburger, Ivo Buchhalter, Marinela Augustin, Walter E. Aulitzky, Peter Hohenberger, Matthias Kroiss, Peter Schirmacher, Richard F. Schlenk, Ulrich Keilholz, Frederick Klauschen, Gunnar Folprecht, Sebastian Bauer, Jens Thomas Siveke, Christian H. Brandts, Thomas Kindler, Melanie Boerries, Anna L. Illert, Nikolas von Bubnoff, Philipp J. Jost, Karsten Spiekermann, Michael Bitzer, Klaus Schulze-Osthoff, Christof von Kalle, Barbara Klink, Benedikt Brors, Albrecht Stenzinger, Evelin Schröck, Daniel Hübschmann, Wilko Weichert, Hanno Glimm, Stefan Fröhling |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 156 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 34 | 22% |
| United States | 25 | 16% |
| Italy | 6 | 4% |
| Belgium | 5 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| France | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Poland | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 52 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 74 | 47% |
| Scientists | 63 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 113 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 39 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 47 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2022.
All research outputs
#353,166
of 25,804,096 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#172
of 4,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,927
of 460,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#11
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,804,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.