↓ Skip to main content

American Association for Cancer Research

Article Metrics

In Situ Analysis of N-Linked Glycans as Potential Biomarkers of Clinical Course in Human Prostate Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cancer Research, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
13 tweeters
Title
In Situ Analysis of N-Linked Glycans as Potential Biomarkers of Clinical Course in Human Prostate Cancer
Published in
Molecular Cancer Research, June 2021
DOI 10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-20-0967
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lindsey R. Conroy, Alexandra E. Stanback, Lyndsay E.A. Young, Harrison A. Clarke, Grant L. Austin, Jinze Liu, Derek B. Allison, Ramon C. Sun

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,555,290
of 18,197,021 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cancer Research
#69
of 1,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,245
of 267,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cancer Research
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,197,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,607 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.