| Title |
Memory-like Differentiation Enhances NK Cell Responses to Melanoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Cancer Research, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0851 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nancy D. Marin, Bradley A. Krasnick, Michelle Becker-Hapak, Leah Conant, Simon P. Goedegebuure, Melissa M. Berrien-Elliott, Keenan J. Robbins, Jennifer A. Foltz, Mark Foster, Pamela Wong, Celia C. Cubitt, Jennifer Tran, Christopher B. Wetzel, Miriam Jacobs, Alice Y. Zhou, David Russler-Germain, Lynne Marsala, Timothy Schappe, Ryan C. Fields, Todd A. Fehniger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 39% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 68% |
| Scientists | 6 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 14 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 32 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2022.
All research outputs
#369,420
of 24,407,785 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#185
of 13,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,966
of 431,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#7
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,407,785 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.