| Title |
Genomes for Kids: The Scope of Pathogenic Mutations in Pediatric Cancer Revealed by Comprehensive DNA and RNA Sequencing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Discovery, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-1631 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Scott Newman, Joy Nakitandwe, Chimene A. Kesserwan, Elizabeth M. Azzato, David A. Wheeler, Michael Rusch, Sheila Shurtleff, Dale J. Hedges, Kayla V. Hamilton, Scott G. Foy, Michael N. Edmonson, Andrew Thrasher, Armita Bahrami, Brent A. Orr, Jeffery M. Klco, Jiali Gu, Lynn W. Harrison, Lu Wang, Michael R. Clay, Annastasia Ouma, Antonina Silkov, Yanling Liu, Zhaojie Zhang, Yu Liu, Samuel W. Brady, Xin Zhou, Ti-Cheng Chang, Manjusha Pande, Eric Davis, Jared Becksfort, Aman Patel, Mark R. Wilkinson, Delaram Rahbarinia, Manish Kubal, Jamie L. Maciaszek, Victor Pastor, Jay Knight, Alexander M. Gout, Jian Wang, Zhaohui Gu, Charles G. Mullighan, Rose B. McGee, Emily A. Quinn, Regina Nuccio, Roya Mostafavi, Elsie L. Gerhardt, Leslie M. Taylor, Jessica M. Valdez, Stacy J. Hines-Dowell, Alberto S. Pappo, Giles Robinson, Liza-Marie Johnson, Ching-Hon Pui, David W. Ellison, James R. Downing, Jinghui Zhang, Kim E. Nichols |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 38% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 49% |
| Scientists | 10 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 36 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 209. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2022.
All research outputs
#189,735
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#70
of 4,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,394
of 447,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#5
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.