↓ Skip to main content

American Association for Cancer Research

Article Metrics

Genomes for Kids: The scope of pathogenic mutations in pediatric cancer revealed by comprehensive DNA and RNA sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Discovery, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 3,074)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
27 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Genomes for Kids: The scope of pathogenic mutations in pediatric cancer revealed by comprehensive DNA and RNA sequencing
Published in
Cancer Discovery, July 2021
DOI 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-1631
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott Newman, Joy Nakitandwe, Chimene A Kesserwan, Elizabeth M Azzato, David A Wheeler, Michael Rusch, Sheila Shurtleff, Dale J Hedges, Kayla V Hamilton, Scott G Foy, Michael N Edmonson, Andrew Thrasher, Armita Bahrami, Brent A Orr, Jeffery M Klco, Jiali Gu, Lynn W Harrison, Lu Wang, Michael R Clay, Annastasia Ouma, Antonina Silkov, Yanling Liu, Zhaojie Zhang, Yu Liu, Samuel W Brady, Xin Zhou, Ti-Cheng Chang, Manjusha Pande, Eric Davis, Jared Becksfort, Aman Patel, Mark R Wilkinson, Delaram Rahbarinia, Manish Kubal, Jamie L Maciaszek, Victor Pastor, Jay Knight, Alexander M Gout, Jian Wang, Zhaohui Gu, Charles G Mullighan, Rose B McGee, Emily A Quinn, Regina Nuccio, Roya Mostafavi, Elsie L Gerhardt, Leslie M Taylor, Jessica M Valdez, Stacy J Hines-Dowell, Alberto S Pappo, Giles Robinson, Liza-Marie Johnson, Ching-Hon Pui, David W Ellison, James R Downing, Jinghui Zhang, Kim E Nichols

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 38%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 4%
Student > Postgraduate 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 207. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2021.
All research outputs
#111,824
of 18,890,258 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#29
of 3,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,388
of 317,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#1
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,890,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.