| Title |
Rates and Patterns of Clonal Oncogenic Mutations in the Normal Human Brain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Discovery, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-0245 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Javier Ganz, Eduardo A. Maury, Basheer Becerra, Sara Bizzotto, Ryan N. Doan, Connor J. Kenny, Taehwan Shin, Junho Kim, Zinan Zhou, Keith L. Ligon, Eunjung Alice Lee, Christopher A. Walsh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 102 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 41 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
| Italy | 4 | 4% |
| France | 4 | 4% |
| Germany | 4 | 4% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Oman | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 31 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 51 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 37 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2022.
All research outputs
#699,378
of 25,603,577 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#370
of 4,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,086
of 437,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#15
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,603,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.