↓ Skip to main content

American Association for Cancer Research

Article Metrics

Aberrant Extrafollicular B Cells, Immune Dysfunction, Myeloid Inflammation, and MyD88-Mutant Progenitors Precede Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia

Overview of attention for article published in Blood Cancer Discovery, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
15 tweeters
Title
Aberrant Extrafollicular B Cells, Immune Dysfunction, Myeloid Inflammation, and MyD88-Mutant Progenitors Precede Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia
Published in
Blood Cancer Discovery, September 2021
DOI 10.1158/2643-3230.bcd-21-0043
Authors

Akhilesh Kaushal, Ajay K. Nooka, Allison R. Carr, Katherine E. Pendleton, Benjamin G. Barwick, Julia Manalo, Samuel S. McCachren, Vikas A. Gupta, Nisha S. Joseph, Craig C. Hofmeister, Jonathan L. Kaufman, Leonard T. Heffner, Stephen M. Ansell, Lawrence H. Boise, Sagar Lonial, Kavita M. Dhodapkar, Madhav V. Dhodapkar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,050,975
of 19,069,422 outputs
Outputs from Blood Cancer Discovery
#23
of 99 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,347
of 298,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood Cancer Discovery
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,069,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.