↓ Skip to main content

American Association for Cancer Research

Article Metrics

Q

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Immunology Research, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
7 tweeters
Title
Q&A: Lisa H. Butterfield, Elizabeth M. Jaffee, and Arlene H. Sharpe on the SITC–AACR Joint Workshop, “The Cancer Biology Underlying Immunotherapy-Induced Autoimmunity”
Published in
Cancer Immunology Research, September 2021
DOI 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-21-0337
Pubmed ID

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2021.
All research outputs
#535,090
of 19,044,106 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Immunology Research
#57
of 1,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,147
of 283,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Immunology Research
#2
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,044,106 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.