Title |
Novel Models of Genetic Education and Testing for Pancreatic Cancer Interception: Preliminary Results from the GENERATE Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Prevention Research, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-20-0642 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
C Sloane Furniss, Matthew B Yurgelun, Chinedu Ukaegbu, Pamela E Constantinou, Catherine C Lafferty, Eliana R Talcove-Berko, Alison N Schwartz, Jill E Stopfer, Meghan Underhill-Blazey, Barbara Kenner, Scott H Nelson, Sydney Okumura, Sherman Law, Alicia Y Zhou, Tara B Coffin, Nicolette J Rodriguez, Hajime Uno, Allyson J Ocean, Florencia McAllister, Andrew M Lowy, Scott M Lippman, Alison P Klein, Lisa Madlensky, Gloria M Petersen, Judy E Garber, Michael G Goggins, Anirban Maitra, Sapna Syngal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 35% |
Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
Indonesia | 1 | 6% |
France | 1 | 6% |
Brazil | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 59% |
Scientists | 4 | 24% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
Researcher | 8 | 10% |
Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Unknown | 42 | 53% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
Psychology | 3 | 4% |
Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 42 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,296,671
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Prevention Research
#398
of 1,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,570
of 440,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Prevention Research
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.