↓ Skip to main content

American Association for Cancer Research

Article Metrics

Utilization of COVID-19 Treatments and Clinical Outcomes among Patients with Cancer: A COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) Cohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Discovery, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 2,819)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
23 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
219 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
Utilization of COVID-19 Treatments and Clinical Outcomes among Patients with Cancer: A COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) Cohort Study
Published in
Cancer Discovery, July 2020
DOI 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-0941
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donna R. Rivera, Solange Peters, Orestis A. Panagiotou, Dimpy P. Shah, Nicole M. Kuderer, Chih-Yuan Hsu, Samuel M. Rubinstein, Brendan J. Lee, Toni K. Choueiri, Gilberto de Lima Lopes, Petros Grivas, Corrie A. Painter, Brian I. Rini, Michael A. Thompson, Jonathan Arcobello, Ziad Bakouny, Deborah B. Doroshow, Pamela C. Egan, Dimitrios Farmakiotis, Leslie A. Fecher, Christopher R. Friese, Matthew D. Galsky, Sanjay Goel, Shilpa Gupta, Thorvardur R. Halfdanarson, Balazs Halmos, Jessica E. Hawley, Ali Raza Khaki, Christopher A. Lemmon, Sanjay Mishra, Adam J. Olszewski, Nathan A. Pennell, Matthew M. Puc, Sanjay G. Revankar, Lidia Schapira, Andrew Schmidt, Gary K. Schwartz, Sumit A. Shah, Julie T. Wu, Zhuoer Xie, Albert C. Yeh, Huili Zhu, Yu Shyr, Gary H. Lyman, Jeremy L. Warner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 219 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 131 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Other 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 11%
Other 34 26%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Unspecified 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 36 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 315. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2021.
All research outputs
#55,841
of 17,065,319 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#16
of 2,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,400
of 300,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#3
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,065,319 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.