↓ Skip to main content

American Association for Cancer Research

Article Metrics

Long-term Outcomes of 1,263 Patients with Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome from 1982 to 2009

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Long-term Outcomes of 1,263 Patients with Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome from 1982 to 2009
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, July 2012
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-0604
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rakhshandra Talpur, Lotika Singh, Seema Daulat, Ping Liu, Sarah Seyfer, Tanya Trynosky, Wei, Madeleine Duvic

Abstract

The purpose of this prospectively collected single center study cohort of 1,263 patients with mycosis fungoides (MF)/Sézary syndrome (SS) is to evaluate the significance of stage and risk of disease progression from initial presentation and to examine other prognostic factors. Patients and Methods: The prognostic variables effecting overall survival (OS) were examined in a unique prospective cohort of 1,263 patients with MF and SS seen by one investigator at MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) from 1982 to 2009. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to determine median OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS). Cox proportional hazards regression model assessed prognostic factors.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 81 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 17 21%
Student > Postgraduate 10 12%
Other 8 10%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 17 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 125. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2021.
All research outputs
#211,942
of 18,954,860 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#80
of 11,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,044
of 138,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#1
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,954,860 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.