| Title |
High PD-1/PD-L1 Checkpoint Interaction Infers Tumor Selection and Therapeutic Sensitivity to Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Research, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1158/0008-5472.can-20-1117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lissete Sánchez-Magraner, James Miles, Claire L. Baker, Christopher J. Applebee, Dae-Jin Lee, Somaia Elsheikh, Shaimaa Lashin, Katriona Withers, Andrew G. Watts, Richard Parry, Christine Edmead, Jose Ignacio Lopez, Raj Mehta, Antoine Italiano, Stephen G. Ward, Peter J. Parker, Banafshé Larijani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| Spain | 3 | 23% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 18 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 22% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2021.
All research outputs
#338,923
of 23,318,744 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#172
of 18,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,866
of 412,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#6
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,318,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.