↓ Skip to main content

American Association for Cancer Research

Patterns of Resistance Differ in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Type I versus Type II FLT3-inhibitors

Overview of attention for article published in Blood Cancer Discovery, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 206)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
56 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Patterns of Resistance Differ in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Type I versus Type II FLT3-inhibitors
Published in
Blood Cancer Discovery, December 2020
DOI 10.1158/2643-3230.bcd-20-0143
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmad S Alotaibi, Musa Yilmaz, Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna, Sanam Loghavi, Tapan M Kadia, Courtney D DiNardo, Gautam Borthakur, Marina Konopleva, Sherry A Pierce, Sa A Wang, Guilin Tang, Veronica Guerra, Bachar Samra, Naveen Pemmaraju, Elias Jabbour, Nicholas J Short, Ghayas C Issa, Maro Ohanian, Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Kapil N Bhalla, Keyur P Patel, Koichi Takahashi, Michael Andreeff, Jorge E Cortes, Hagop M Kantarjian, Farhad Ravandi, Naval Daver

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 15 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Unknown 14 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,203,036
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Blood Cancer Discovery
#49
of 206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,389
of 518,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood Cancer Discovery
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.