↓ Skip to main content

American Association for Cancer Research

Time-Dependent Effects of Oral Contraceptive Use on Breast, Ovarian, and Endometrial Cancers

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Research, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 18,790)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Time-Dependent Effects of Oral Contraceptive Use on Breast, Ovarian, and Endometrial Cancers
Published in
Cancer Research, February 2021
DOI 10.1158/0008-5472.can-20-2476
Pubmed ID
Authors

Torgny Karlsson, Therese Johansson, Julia Höglund, Weronica E Ek, Åsa Johansson

Abstract

Oral contraceptive use has been suggested to influence the risk of breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancer. The purpose of this study is to clarify the time-dependent effects between long-term oral contraceptive use and cancer risk. We performed an observational study in 256,661 women from UK Biobank, born between 1939 and 1970. Information on cancer diagnoses were collected from self-reported data and from national registers until March 2019. Cumulative risk of cancer over the timespan of the study, as measured by the odds ratio (OR), and instantaneous risk, as measured by the hazard ratio (HR), were assessed using Logistic and Cox regression analyses, respectively. The odds were lower among ever users, compared with never users, for ovarian cancer: OR=0.72 (95% CI: 0.65-0.81) and endometrial cancer: OR=0.68 (95% CI: 0.62-0.75), an association that was stronger with longer use (P<0.001). Increased odds were seen for breast cancer in women when limiting the follow-up to 55 years of age: OR=1.10 (95% CI: 1.03-1.17), but not for the full timespan. We only found a higher HR for breast cancer in former users immediately (≤2 years) after discontinued oral contraceptive use (HR=1.55, 95% CI: 1.06-2.28), whereas the protective association for ovarian and endometrial cancer remained significant up to 35 years after last use of oral contraceptives. Given the body of evidence presented in our study, we argue that oral contraceptives can dramatically reduce women's risk of ovarian and endometrial cancer, whereas their effect on lifetime risk of breast cancer is limited.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 17%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Researcher 6 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 5%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 51 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Unspecified 3 3%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 53 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 388. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#80,095
of 25,651,057 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#47
of 18,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,746
of 565,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#1
of 336 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,651,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 565,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 336 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.