| Title |
A Randomized Comparison of Different Vaginal Self-sampling Devices and Urine for Human Papillomavirus Testing—Predictors 5.1
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-1226 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Louise Cadman, Caroline Reuter, Mark Jitlal, Michelle Kleeman, Janet Austin, Tony Hollingworth, Anna L. Parberry, Lesley Ashdown-Barr, Deepali Patel, Belinda Nedjai, Attila T. Lorincz, Jack Cuzick |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 30 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 154. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#266,288
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#97
of 4,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,962
of 526,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#5
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 526,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.