↓ Skip to main content

American Association for Cancer Research

Article Metrics

PML/RARa Destabilization by Hyperthermia: A New Model for Oncogenic Fusion Protein Degradation?

Overview of attention for article published in Blood Cancer Discovery, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 tweeters
Title
PML/RARa Destabilization by Hyperthermia: A New Model for Oncogenic Fusion Protein Degradation?
Published in
Blood Cancer Discovery, May 2021
DOI 10.1158/2643-3230.bcd-21-0071
Authors

Hsin Chieh Wu, Domitille Rérolle, Hugues de Thé

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,897,914
of 17,986,329 outputs
Outputs from Blood Cancer Discovery
#31
of 76 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,790
of 305,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood Cancer Discovery
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,986,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.