↓ Skip to main content

American Association for Cancer Research

Article Metrics

Longitudinal evaluation of neuromuscular dysfunction in long-term survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
Title
Longitudinal evaluation of neuromuscular dysfunction in long-term survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, June 2021
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-0154
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rozalyn L. Rodwin, Yan Chen, Yutaka Yasui, Wendy M. Leisenring, Todd M. Gibson, Paul C. Nathan, Rebecca M. Howell, Kevin R. Krull, Caroline Mohrmann, Robert J. Hayashi, Eric J Chow, Kevin C. Oeffinger, Gregory T. Armstrong, Kirsten K. Ness, Nina S Kadan-Lottick

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,237,933
of 17,956,456 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#1,009
of 3,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,180
of 201,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#6
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,956,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.