↓ Skip to main content

American Association for Cancer Research

Article Metrics

The COronavirus Pandemic Epidemiology (COPE) Consortium: A Call to Action

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
30 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
Title
The COronavirus Pandemic Epidemiology (COPE) Consortium: A Call to Action
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, May 2020
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0606
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew T. Chan, David A. Drew, Long H. Nguyen, Amit D. Joshi, Wenjie Ma, Chuan-Guo Guo, Chun-Han Lo, Raaj S. Mehta, Sohee Kwon, Daniel R. Sikavi, Marina V. Magicheva-Gupta, Zahra S. Fatehi, Jacqueline J. Flynn, Brianna M. Leonardo, Christine M. Albert, Gabriella Andreotti, Laura E. Beane-Freeman, Bijal A. Balasubramanian, John S. Brownstein, Fiona Bruinsma, Annie N. Cowan, Anusila Deka, Michael E. Ernst, Jane C. Figueiredo, Paul W. Franks, Christopher D. Gardner, Irene M. Ghobrial, Christopher A. Haiman, Janet E. Hall, Sandra L. Deming-Halverson, Brenda Kirpach, James V. Lacey, Loïc Le Marchand, Catherine R. Marinac, Maria Elena Martinez, Roger L. Milne, Anne M. Murray, Denis Nash, Julie R. Palmer, Alpa V. Patel, Lynn Rosenberg, Dale P. Sandler, Shreela V. Sharma, Shepherd H. Schurman, Lynne R. Wilkens, Jorge E. Chavarro, A. Heather Eliassen, Jaime E. Hart, Jae Hee Kang, Karestan C. Koenen, Laura D. Kubzansky, Lorelei A. Mucci, Sebastien Ourselin, Janet W. Rich-Edwards, Mingyang Song, Meir J. Stampfer, Claire J. Steves, Walter C. Willett, Jonathan Wolf, Tim Spector

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 179 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 17%
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Professor 13 7%
Other 42 23%
Unknown 37 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 12%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Psychology 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 47 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 98. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2021.
All research outputs
#254,401
of 17,635,820 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#105
of 3,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,275
of 285,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#2
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,635,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.