↓ Skip to main content

American Association for Cancer Research

Article Metrics

A Genetic Risk Score to Personalize Prostate Cancer Screening, Applied to Population Data

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
A Genetic Risk Score to Personalize Prostate Cancer Screening, Applied to Population Data
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, June 2020
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-19-1527
Pubmed ID
Authors

Minh-Phuong Huynh-Le, Chun Chieh Fan, Roshan Karunamuni, Eleanor I. Walsh, Emma L. Turner, J. Athene Lane, Richard M. Martin, David E. Neal, Jenny L. Donovan, Freddie C. Hamdy, J. Kellogg Parsons, Rosalind A. Eeles, Douglas F. Easton, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Ali Amin Al Olama, Sara Benlloch Garcia, Kenneth Muir, Henrik Grönberg, Fredrik Wiklund, Markus Aly, Johanna Schleutker, Csilla Sipeky, Teuvo LJ Tammela, Børge Grønne Nordestgaard, Timothy J. Key, Ruth C. Travis, Paul D.P. Pharoah, Nora Pashayan, Kay-Tee Khaw, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Shannon K. McDonnell, Daniel J. Schaid, Christiane Maier, Walther Vogel, Manuel Luedeke, Kathleen Herkommer, Adam S. Kibel, Cezary Cybulski, Dominika Wokolorczyk, Wojciech Kluzniak, Lisa A. Cannon-Albright, Hermann Brenner, Ben Schöttker, Bernd Holleczek, Jong Y. Park, Thomas A. Sellers, Hui-Yi Lin, Chavdar Kroumov Slavov, Radka P. Kaneva, Vanio I. Mitev, Jyotsna Batra, Judith A. Clements, Amanda B. Spurdle, Manuel R. Teixeira, Paula Paulo, Sofia Maia, Hardev Pandha, Agnieszka Michael, Ian G. Mills, Ole A. Andreassen, Anders M. Dale, Tyler M. Seibert

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 7 18%
Researcher 7 18%
Other 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 28%
Computer Science 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 8 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,635,277
of 17,381,824 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#867
of 3,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,177
of 295,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#14
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,381,824 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,944 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.