| Title |
Pharmacologic Screening Identifies Metabolic Vulnerabilities of CD8+ T Cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Immunology Research, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-20-0384 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jefte M. Drijvers, Jacob E. Gillis, Tara Muijlwijk, Thao H. Nguyen, Emily F. Gaudiano, Isaac S. Harris, Martin W. LaFleur, Alison E. Ringel, Cong-Hui Yao, Kiran Kurmi, Vikram R. Juneja, Justin D. Trombley, Marcia C. Haigis, Arlene H. Sharpe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 45% |
| Belgium | 2 | 6% |
| Kenya | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Israel | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 42% |
| Scientists | 13 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 27% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,046,847
of 25,331,507 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Immunology Research
#207
of 1,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,987
of 522,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Immunology Research
#8
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,331,507 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 522,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.