↓ Skip to main content

American Association for Cancer Research

Article Metrics

STIM1 Mediates Calcium-dependent Epigenetic Reprogramming in Pancreatic Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Research, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
Title
STIM1 Mediates Calcium-dependent Epigenetic Reprogramming in Pancreatic Cancer
Published in
Cancer Research, January 2021
DOI 10.1158/0008-5472.can-20-2874
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana P. Kutschat, Feda H. Hamdan, Xin Wang, Alexander Q. Wixom, Zeynab Najafova, Christine S. Gibhardt, Waltraut Kopp, Jochen Gaedcke, Philipp Ströbel, Volker Ellenrieder, Ivan Bogeski, Elisabeth Hessmann, Steven A. Johnsen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,218,903
of 16,626,599 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#1,850
of 14,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,646
of 251,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#17
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,626,599 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.